Harry Schwarz, anti-apartheid crusader and South African Jewish leader, dies

February 8th, 2010

Today JTA is reporting that Harry Schwarz, a refugee from Nazi German and a  longtime South African Jewish leader, has died at the age of 86.

Schwarz, who served as South Africa’s ambassador to the United States in the early 1990s, was an anti-apartheid activist and legal defender of Nelson Mandela. But as U.S. ambassador,  he also fought against the international sanctions that most observers believe were the key to eventually bringing down the apartheid regime.

In a 1991 interview, Schwarz told me his status as a refugee from Nazi Germany gave him a particular distaste for the party that kept South Africa under its iron grip between 1948 and the fall of apartheid.

“There are several elements in the development of my feelings about apartheid,” he said in that interview. “First, I am Jewish; being Jewish, you have certain value standards, and you have a certain belief that your own people have been discriminated against over many centuries. Therefore, you cannot be a person who discriminates, or who is party to a  discriminating procedure.”

And he was influenced by the fact the creators of the apartheid system supported the wrong side in World War II.

“After the war, in 1948, the National Party came into power in South Africa,” he told me. “To me, they were the people who had supported Germany during the war. As a young man, it was very objectionable to me that the very people I had been fighting against were the people that the National Party had supported.”

Ironically, as ambassador he was serving a government dominated by that same National Party.

At the time I wrote: “Mr. Schwarz’s resume makes him a very elusive target for anti-apartheid forces here, who suspect that his real role in Washington is to weaken the pro-sanctions movement–and in particular, to drive a wedge between the movement and the Jewish community.”

His presence in Washington was uncomfortable for some of the Jewish groups that had made South Africa sanctions a top priority.

Complex? Yes. But there’s little doubt Schwarz was an anti-apartheid crusader at a time when such crusades were dangerous.

Leave a Reply


Rep. Ackerman counsels - gasp - patience on Iran

February 5th, 2010

Leave a Reply


Obama hit from both sides on faith-based initiative

February 4th, 2010

Leave a Reply


Blogging the New Israel Fund flap

February 3rd, 2010

Leave a Reply


National Prayer Breakfast controversy - again. And where are the Jews?

February 2nd, 2010

Leave a Reply


Jewish groups react to Obama budget proposal, part 1

February 1st, 2010

Leave a Reply


WaPo documents Israel-Micronesia friendship

February 1st, 2010

Leave a Reply


Genachowski, Rosenthal lead U.S. delegation to Auschwitz liberation commemoration

January 27th, 2010

Leave a Reply


Obama’s spending freeze: Band aid leadership?

January 27th, 2010

One Response to “Obama’s spending freeze: Band aid leadership?”

  1. Jeff Says:

    Word. Here’s a graphic showing the impact of Bush policies and the recession, as compared to bailouts, Obama policies, etc.

    http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2009/06/09/business/economy/20090610-leonhardt-graphic.html

    The long-run deficit is almost entirely a health-care cost growth problem. Obama has previously expressed this view but now moved on to the more important election-year preening.

    http://www.cepr.net/calculators/hc/hc-calculator.html

    A big problem is incoherent public views and lack of understanding of basic economics. People want the government to tighten its belt in the recession, like they do, but that makes things worse. People want lower taxes, more services, and deficit reduction all at once.

    And the exemption of “security” spending is especially galling, but that’s the iron triangle for you.

    Sad to see Obama make such large rhetorical concessions instead of reframing the issues.

Leave a Reply


Jewish Democrats, Republicans trade shots on Holocaust allusions

January 26th, 2010

2 Responses to “Jewish Democrats, Republicans trade shots on Holocaust allusions”

  1. Mike L Says:

    You should probably let readers know that Kirk is one of the top pro-Israel members of Congress. The NJDC sent their release after seeing Kirk post this: http://kirk.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3738&Itemid=115.

  2. anony Says:

    RJC also forgot its own exploitation and abuse of holocaust imagry to promote partisan political agendas
    http://bit.ly/cAItEu

Leave a Reply


Howard Berman, Peace Now and right-wing pot shotters

January 25th, 2010

2 Responses to “Howard Berman, Peace Now and right-wing pot shotters”

  1. Pro-JStreet student Says:

    I’m glad Berman is the chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee…and supportive of JStreet’s mission for peace! He is a clear example that “pro-Israel” doesn’t mean right-wing.

  2. Michelle Says:

    Did you see that the RJC was “foolish enough” to attack Berman for his comments to APN? Check it out: http://www.njdc.org/blog/post/rjcquestionsbermanscommitment012710

    Also I found video of Berman’s comments at: http://peacenow.org/entries/house_foreign_affairs_chair_talks_about_apn

Leave a Reply


Sieradski’s prescriptions for a Jewish communal revolution

January 25th, 2010

Leave a Reply


Supreme Court campaign finance decision and Jewish clout

January 22nd, 2010

Leave a Reply


APN call to Obama: Pressure Israel, Palestinians; ain’t gonna happen

January 21st, 2010

One Response to “APN call to Obama: Pressure Israel, Palestinians; ain’t gonna happen”

  1. Ori Nir Says:

    Here is APN’s response to this posting.

    http://peacenow.org/entries/drawing_the_wrong_conclusions_my_response_to_jim_besser

    Drawing the wrong conclusions (my response to Jim Besser)
    By Lara Friedman on January 22, 2010 9:55 AM | No Comments

    I read with some disappointment James Besser’s response (in the New York Jewish Week) to APN’s call for President Barack Obama to be more aggressive in the pursuit of Middle East peace.

    Besser concedes that:

    “APN is probably right that U.S. pressure on both sides is the only strategy with any real hope of pushing the two sides back to the negotiating table.”

    But he also argues that:

    “Leaving aside the question of whether that’s smart policy or not, politics suggests the administration is likely to move in the opposite direction.”

    Let’s hope David Axelrod isn’t drawing this same mistaken conclusion. As we argued in the same paper that Besser is critiquing, Obama has little to lose — and everything to gain — by stepping up pressure to make progress toward peace.

    We said:

    “…right-wing opponents of peace in the US and Israel will attack President Obama for his Middle East peace efforts, irrespective of approach. Whatever he does, Israeli right-wingers will portray his efforts as a threat to Israel. Whatever he does, their US supporters will try to use his efforts in the next election to say that he - and Democrats in general - are too tough on Israel. If President Obama continues with the strategy of patience and soft words in 2010, he again takes the hit while in all likelihood achieving little, or at best far less than he aimed for - just like in 2009.

    “Conversely, if President Obama plays hardball in 2010, he has the chance to launch a process that could do what no other president has succeeded in doing: end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. And when Israeli right-wingers and their US allies try to accuse him of being too tough on Israel (which they inevitably will do) President Obama can look them and the world in the eye and proudly stand by a Middle East peace policy that is credible, serious and has a real chance of success.”

    So I respectfully disagree with Besser that politics suggest the Administration should scale-back its peace efforts. Candidate Obama aimed high. He inspired millions of Americans who believed that his presidency could be transformative. He was swept into office by a coalition built on excitement and on hope. It would be bad politics to abandon this coalition.

    For Obama, it is thus both smart policy and smart politics to press ahead, boldly and decisively, to achieve Middle East peace.

Leave a Reply


Israel Policy Forum gets absorbed by CAP

January 21st, 2010

Leave a Reply


Brown’s victory in Mass., Obama’s woes and Capitol Hill gridlock

January 20th, 2010

One Response to “Brown’s victory in Mass., Obama’s woes and Capitol Hill gridlock”

  1. Fred Mason Says:

    Still don’t get the message…ObamaNation is “not good for the Jews”! or for America…

Leave a Reply


New Testament inscriptions on Army, Marine rifle sights?

January 19th, 2010

One Response to “New Testament inscriptions on Army, Marine rifle sights?”

  1. Joel Says:

    That does seem over the top. But at the same time, I know individual Soldiers in the war zone have their own way of coping with combat, some of it unorthodox for even Christians. It’s a bit of a stretch, a hasty generalization, to conclude that this is representative of conservative Christians. However, let’s turn the tables; how many atheists are shedding their blood for American foreign policy?

Leave a Reply


Jewish organizations: too many, or not different enough?

January 15th, 2010

Leave a Reply


More on Haiti: the good, the bad and the ugly

January 15th, 2010

Leave a Reply


Pat Robertson knows who’s to blame for Haiti tragedy

January 13th, 2010

One Response to “Pat Robertson knows who’s to blame for Haiti tragedy”

  1. KRG Says:

    Continually shocking. Luckily, even a lot of the conservatives are pushing back on him for this.

Leave a Reply